[22:55:51] [connected at Thu Mar 29 22:55:51 2018] [22:55:52] [I have joined #xf-bod] [22:56:53] <danvet> secretary, howdy [22:56:53] <secretary> danvet: I'm just the secretary, dutifully keeping logs of this meeting [23:00:35] <danvet> mupuf, agd5f bryce egbert keithp Riastradh around for the mtg? [23:00:43] <agd5f> hi [23:00:54] <danvet> hi [23:01:41] <egbert> hi guys! [23:06:21] <danvet> hm, not much yet .... [23:06:28] <danvet> I guess we'll wait for a bit more [23:06:41] <danvet> otherwise I get to tell a few folks that we'll delay decisions once more :- [23:06:46] <danvet> :-/ [23:07:14] <egbert> hrm, everybody seems to be on Easter vacation already. [23:07:35] <egbert> not sure - is tomorrow off in the US? don't remember... [23:07:54] <tlwoerner> egbert: yes [23:08:09] <egbert> tlwoerner: this explains things. [23:08:41] <egbert> too long that i've been in the us on goodfriday [23:08:45] <danvet> well tomorrow is also off in .ch [23:09:09] <egbert> danvet: i expected this. but - your are from .ch. [23:09:19] <egbert> this explains why you are here ;) [23:09:42] <egbert> here it is off as well, of course. [23:09:45] <agd5f> I have to work tomorrow [23:09:50] <tlwoerner> in NA "good friday" is usually a holiday for all, monday is a holiday for banks, government, but a regular workday for most [23:09:56] <egbert> agd5f: oh? [23:10:07] <keithp> meeting? [23:10:14] <egbert> here it is an official holiday. [23:10:16] <agd5f> good friday isn't commonly given in the US. too religious [23:10:19] <egbert> keithp: hey! [23:10:34] <egbert> agd5f: i thought so. [23:10:42] <danvet> keithp, mtg [23:11:04] <danvet> we're 4 people, with my secretary powers we could even vote! [23:11:14] <Riastradh> Hi! [23:11:15] <danvet> but maybe wait a bit more [23:11:19] <danvet> oh 5 [23:11:20] <egbert> sure, let's go ahead [23:11:30] <danvet> Agenda: outreachy expense, sponsoring policies, gsoc, voting [23:11:33] <tlwoerner> robclark said he's be late, but coming [23:11:33] <danvet> anything to add? [23:11:39] <danvet> ok [23:12:19] <danvet> so outreachy expense: we (seanpaul and me) had a dri-devel outreachy intern this winter, and she bought a rpi + panel for that [23:12:33] <danvet> completed successfully, got the stuff even merged through the bikesheds [23:12:42] <egbert> good! [23:12:52] <danvet> we figured she could ask the x.org board to get the hw reimbursed (outreachy itself doesn't have that included) [23:12:59] <danvet> it's 148$ all together [23:13:11] <egbert> +1 from my side! [23:13:13] <Riastradh> +1 [23:13:18] <agd5f> +1 [23:13:22] <danvet> iirc we have in the past sponsored student hw for internships and stuff [23:13:36] <danvet> +1 from me too ofc :-) [23:13:38] <danvet> keithp, ? [23:14:17] <egbert> i believe this is fine. and the amount is not big. so this seems to be very well spent. [23:14:55] <danvet> ok, I guess that carries [23:14:57] <danvet> thx all [23:15:03] <danvet> I'll ping bryce to reimburse [23:15:35] <tlwoerner> danvet: that's US$ i assume? [23:15:43] <danvet> ah yes, I converted [23:15:49] <danvet> mtg minutes state 148 USD [23:16:12] <danvet> shipping the stuff to india was somewhat of an adventure, had to find local suppliers :-) [23:16:30] <keithp> sorry, distracted by irc. +1 from me as well :-) [23:16:37] <danvet> keithp, thx [23:16:59] <danvet> next up: sponsoring clarification for organizers [23:17:08] <danvet> we discussed it last mtg, but didn't get around to voting [23:17:57] <danvet> https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/8bEzmKQj3HwxXH40s8cUkg current diff [23:18:06] <danvet> robclark, hi [23:18:12] <robclark> o/ [23:19:48] <danvet> robclark, https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/8bEzmKQj3HwxXH40s8cUkg talking about the sponsoring clarification from last meeting [23:19:58] * robclark looks [23:20:04] <danvet> iirc we went through it all, would be good if we can decide [23:20:28] <keithp> I suspect we'll revisit it after this XDC, but it looks good enough for now [23:20:49] <danvet> hm, minutes says inconclusive, but not why [23:20:54] <danvet> I guess I was lazy with typing [23:21:04] <danvet> keithp, yeah, we'll respin this a few more times I think [23:21:09] <keithp> https://www.x.org/wiki/Events/SponsorshipLevels/ [23:21:18] <keithp> there's the original in case others want to see how the patch works [23:21:56] <agd5f> yeah, looks ok to me [23:21:59] <Riastradh> keithp: The patch does not appear to apply to that? Context mismatch? [23:22:10] <robclark> minor bikeshed perhaps, "Monetary contributions by local sponsors".. maybe something like "Monetary or in-kind" or "Monetary or goods.." or something like that, but basically looks good [23:22:15] <Riastradh> (I don't see `All sponsors will also receive perks per the' in <https://www.x.org/wiki/Events/SponsorshipLevels/>.) [23:22:39] <keithp> Riastradh: hrm. afraid I don't know where the pre-patch version might be then? [23:22:48] <danvet> robclark, ok I can fix that [23:23:02] <danvet> oh, the diff is against an older version, there was some other cleanup [23:23:15] <danvet> the rebased version is on another machine [23:23:18] <keithp> heh [23:23:24] * danvet in the Swiss Alps enjoying the long w/e [23:23:26] <keithp> my mesa patches get like that [23:23:33] <Riastradh> No worries, I have no objection either way. [23:23:38] <keithp> danvet: you live in the swiss alps... [23:23:43] <keithp> (or at least proximal) [23:23:46] <danvet> no [23:23:51] <danvet> well, by US standards maybe [23:23:58] <robclark> closer than I do ;-) [23:24:06] <danvet> there's like cities and lowlands and another mountain ridge in between [23:24:10] <danvet> yeah [23:24:31] <Riastradh> `To a European, a hundred kilometers is a long distance. To an American, a hundred years is a long time.' [23:24:35] <danvet> ok, so with robclarks "or in-kind" addition, everyone agrees with the text? [23:24:41] <egbert> i'm still trying to understand the first sentence fully... [23:25:06] <robclark> danvet, +1 from me [23:25:10] <keithp> yeah, I think it will work for this year. +1 from me [23:25:31] <danvet> egbert, it works better with German commas :-) [23:25:32] <egbert> 'perk's refers to recognition? [23:25:56] <egbert> sorry, but this word doesn't belong to my standard vocab [23:26:29] <danvet> egbert, Vergütung [23:26:35] <danvet> so yeah [23:26:46] <danvet> what you get in return for shovelling money at us [23:26:55] <keithp> https://www.google.com/search?&q=perquisite [23:27:00] <keithp> is the origin of 'perk', iirc [23:27:02] <egbert> Vergütung doesn't make sense in connection with the rest [23:27:18] <danvet> TIL [23:27:38] <Riastradh> Maybe `benefit' would be clearer? [23:27:47] <danvet> yeah, that's probably clearer [23:27:54] <danvet> so s/perk/benefit/ [23:27:56] <keithp> and more accurate [23:28:15] <egbert> the 'perks' for the platinum, gold ... sponsors are listed explicitely. [23:28:32] <egbert> ... in the full document. [23:28:55] <danvet> yes they're above the new hunk [23:29:40] <egbert> right. so the platinum, gold and ... whatever sponsors receive mostly recocnigiton. [23:30:37] <mupuf> Sorry guys, was in the sauna and did not hear the alarm! [23:30:38] <egbert> is this also the case for the conference organizers - or do the also receive monetary compenstation. [23:30:44] <egbert> ? [23:30:58] <egbert> it would make sense for expenses they have. [23:31:08] <danvet> egbert, that's what this text tries to clarify [23:31:26] <danvet> we reimburse expenses, but not the labour that goes into organizing [23:32:00] <egbert> i guess i don't understand what the term 'discount' means in this context. [23:32:04] <danvet> for that part, they get the discount on sponsoring (which is 5kUSD = Gold level) [23:32:15] <danvet> they pay less for sponsoring [23:32:27] <danvet> it's all in the full doc [23:32:30] <robclark> (fwiw, using word "reimburse" rather than "compensate" might be better.. at least in english I think "compensate" could imply being paid, ie. for labor) [23:32:35] <danvet> keithp had the link somewhere [23:32:46] <danvet> robclark, good point [23:32:51] <danvet> I'll add another edit [23:33:06] <danvet> s/paid/reimbursed/ [23:33:12] <Riastradh> egbert: From the current state on the wiki: `To recognize all the work that goes into organizing an XDC the hosts and organizers will get the Gold level for free, and the Platinum level at a steep discount.' [23:33:31] <Riastradh> (https://www.x.org/wiki/Events/SponsorshipLevels/) [23:33:48] <egbert> Riastradh: i don't read this in there sorry. [23:34:40] <danvet> egbert, it's there ...? [23:34:54] <Riastradh> It's near the top, last paragraph under `Principles'. [23:36:03] <danvet> https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/TiscWK2SJ9lmpmIAHZaaew [23:36:06] <danvet> full source code [23:36:17] <danvet> only thing we're adding is the Details section at the bottom [23:36:23] <egbert> ok, now i get it. [23:36:26] <danvet> everything else is unchanged [23:36:56] <danvet> robclark, pls double check I didn't miss an edit, it's w/e here :-) [23:37:11] <egbert> i guess, it is fine with me. [23:37:30] <robclark> technically, it is w/e here too.. only just barely [23:37:36] <egbert> this is something that may have to be revisited after having more experience. [23:37:42] <danvet> yup [23:37:55] <egbert> so, from me +1 [23:38:05] <danvet> robclark, keithp still +1 after the small edits? [23:38:20] * robclark reading full src [23:38:40] <danvet> mupuf, agd5f Riastradh [23:38:49] <Riastradh> +1 [23:38:52] <mupuf> I'm still checking it [23:38:59] <robclark> danvet, hmm, paste link to last version of patch again? [23:39:14] <agd5f> +1 [23:39:17] <danvet> https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/L4rCLviwpkaJMPSkusHfug [23:39:23] <robclark> thx [23:39:26] <danvet> should contain all the edits we discussed here [23:39:51] <robclark> danvet, lgtm [23:39:54] <robclark> +1 [23:39:57] <mupuf> +1 [23:40:48] <agd5f> +1 [23:41:01] <danvet> agd5f, you don't have 2 votes :-) [23:41:16] <keithp> +1 [23:41:44] <danvet> ok, I think we have all [23:41:46] <danvet> mupuf, gsoc? [23:42:13] <mupuf> So, we got 4 applicants [23:42:59] <mupuf> 2 goods, 2 terrible ones [23:43:23] <danvet> not enough PR, or gfx is uncool? [23:43:40] <mupuf> But the good ones, are amazing [23:44:10] <mupuf> Both, i guess! [23:44:58] <danvet> what's next? [23:45:13] <mupuf> Just allocate slots [23:45:19] <mupuf> Already asked for 2 [23:45:47] <keithp> seems straightforward to me? [23:46:22] <mupuf> The two students who are good already have patches upstream [23:46:28] <mupuf> So, all good!! [23:46:28] <danvet> mupuf, btw xdc page should go out soon, need to get last year's round invited [23:46:35] <danvet> plus the winter outreachy intern [23:46:49] <danvet> ok I guess that's it for gsoc? [23:47:01] <mupuf> Yeah, sorry for being slow [23:47:07] <mupuf> Typing on my phone... [23:47:20] <danvet> np [23:47:29] <danvet> robclark, voting is happening, I guess that's it? [23:47:41] <danvet> I'll put the deadline in the minutes, as reminder [23:47:48] <robclark> yup [23:48:03] <robclark> seemed to work for me, and no one has complained to me yet about it being broken [23:48:08] <danvet> yeah same here [23:48:11] <robclark> (I assume at least some of you have voted by now ;-)) [23:48:38] <robclark> not sure if there is a way to check how many have voted yet.. I was at linaro last week and busy catching up this week [23:48:53] <danvet> vote closes next Thu, iirc we need to make sure we close it on time [23:48:55] <robclark> so haven't even thought about it since last thurs when I sent out the mail and cast my votes ;-) [23:48:59] <robclark> yup [23:49:10] <robclark> nice thing is the voting system is automated that way [23:49:12] <danvet> iirc whot made a page to check that [23:49:23] <danvet> and send out nag mails to those who haven't voted yet [23:49:35] <danvet> but we only use the Soviet methods when we vote on bylaw changes :-) [23:49:55] <robclark> there is a tally-votes page, not sure if there was something else.. I guess I can look at the php and see what else there is [23:49:57] <danvet> robclark, oh it autocloses? [23:50:01] <robclark> yeah [23:50:08] <danvet> cool, we can slack [23:50:09] <robclark> you give it a start and end date+time [23:50:17] <danvet> probably should still check it out on Fri morning [23:51:03] <danvet> ok, I think that's it [23:51:05] <danvet> anything else? [23:51:31] <robclark> I think that is it [23:51:59] <robclark> I should probably send a reminder ping tonight since this is the half-way point of the election [23:52:09] <robclark> I'll do that after the mtg [23:55:11] <danvet> yeah, good idea [23:55:49] <danvet> ok, thanks everyone for joining
[23:56:07] [disconnected at Thu Mar 29 23:56:07 2018]