23:00 <+egbert> hi guys! i guess i volunteered to run the meeting today/night since danvet is off 23:00 <+egbert> so who do we have here? whot, agd5f, bryce, robclark - i saw mupuf join 23:00 < mupuf> hey you :) 23:00 <+egbert> hey mupuf 23:01 <+egbert> so still wating for keithp 23:01 <+egbert> shall we get started? 23:01 < robclark> sure 23:02 < bryce> yep 23:02 <+egbert> agenda: elections, gsoc, paperwork, 23:02 <+egbert> khronos? 23:02 <+egbert> ah, xdc 23:03 <+egbert> anything else? 23:03 < mupuf> sounds about right! 23:03 <+egbert> lets start with elections 23:03 <+egbert> so the expiry period is over i've just read. we can start with the next step. 23:04 < agd5f> egbert, just waiting for the 30 day period to end. going to send out the initial email tonight 23:04 < whot> the first couple of weeks are mostly sending out emails anyway 23:04 <+egbert> agd5f: i just read above that it did already. 23:04 <+egbert> whot: right. 23:04 < agd5f> egbert, yup 23:05 < whot> it would be prudent to have the membership changes finalised at the start of the election period, so we don't have members have to read them on the last day 23:05 < whot> but given the changes, it's not like this is a big issue 23:05 <+egbert> whot: definitely. 23:05 < whot> (note to self, link to git repo in email for diffs) 23:06 < robclark> I guess I need to update memberagreement branch w/ r-b's, etc... I guess we keep it on a branch, tho, until after it is voted on? 23:07 < whot> yep 23:07 <+egbert> robclark: yeah, this sound like a good plan. 23:07 <+egbert> so it looks like everything is on time and in plan regarding the election. 23:08 < robclark> ok, I'll update branch.. I guess I should update bylaws too w/ the trick to get date from git... although I assume mechanical changes like that don't need vote? 23:09 < mupuf> robclark: people complained they did not have time to react before 23:09 < mupuf> so, 23:09 < mupuf> let's release early! 23:09 < whot> i forgot, do we need 2/3 or 50% this time? 23:09 <+egbert> yes, i'd rather slip the election date by a week. 23:09 < robclark> (btw, we should also find some better place than git for generated pdf but that is something I think we can solve later) 23:10 <+egbert> do we want a discussion period for the membership agreement? 23:10 < mupuf> yeah, we should ask 23:10 < robclark> mupuf, anyways, I can regenerate latest memberagreement.pdf tonight so we can send it out w/ election notice if you want.. 23:10 < mupuf> asking for suggestions from the community 23:10 <+egbert> not that i've seen too many discussions happening in the past, it is still goodp ractice to have one 23:10 < robclark> (or I can send separately) 23:10 < mupuf> nothing else 23:11 < mupuf> robclark: would be absolutely perfect 23:11 <+egbert> mupuf: also put a link on to it from the election page, please. 23:12 <+egbert> ok, anything else regarding elections? 23:12 * mupuf does not deal with elections this year 23:12 < mupuf> :D 23:12 <+egbert> shall we move on to gsoc? 23:12 < mupuf> yeeeeppeeeee 23:12 < mupuf> I can talk about the gsoc 23:12 <+egbert> mupuf: please go ahead! 23:12 < mupuf> One sentence: we are waiting for google to tell us if we got accepted or not! 23:13 < mupuf> Answer on the 26th 23:13 < whot> that's two sentences 23:13 < mupuf> :s 23:13 <+egbert> at least we've got a definitive date 23:13 <+egbert> ok, so this is all about gsoc i guess? 23:13 < mupuf> yep 23:13 <+egbert> ok, so next topic: paperwork 23:14 <+egbert> we did cover the membership agreement already 23:14 <+egbert> anything we need to cover on spi, finaicial status etc? 23:14 <+egbert> bryce? 23:14 < bryce> heya 23:15 < bryce> a few minor bits 23:15 < bryce> Still waiting to hear back from SPI on a dump of our 2016 financial info; I re-pinged a couple weeks ago, will do so again. 23:15 <+egbert> bryce: thanks! 23:16 < bryce> I filed for the reimbursement for the dissolution fee, and was surprised they reimbursed immediately 23:16 < bryce> so spi is slow on response on some stuff, but not other stuff. :-) 23:16 <+egbert> it is good to know that they at least pay in time :) 23:17 < bryce> As per discussion last meeting, I've revised my finance docs branch, to remove names from changelogs (and filenames). The branch is ready to land; I'd love to get a few +1 reviews, but can land it if no one has any further issues 23:18 <+egbert> bryce: you want that tonight? 23:18 < bryce> egbert, that would be great 23:18 <+egbert> bryce: i have to admit i haven't really looked at it in detail, but i'd still think it's ok 23:19 < bryce> also, still needing gpg keys from board members, I'm not sure we sorted out a plan of attack there, but I'm open to whatever. But until that's done no one else will be able to access the financial docs 23:19 <+egbert> bryce: ok 23:19 < bryce> egbert, the branch's content is encrypted so the review is mainly checking that it's not leaking anything sensitive. I don't expect any in depth reviewing of what's inside. :-) 23:20 <+egbert> ok 23:20 < bryce> last bit, I've started drafting the 2016 treasurer report. 23:20 < bryce> just the bones though; I can only go so far without the data from SPI 23:21 < bryce> egbert, think that covers everything from me, thanks. 23:21 < robclark> (jfyi, updated https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/foundation/bylaws/log/?h=memberagreement-updates including regenerated pdfs .. if someone is sending election noticed feel free to include link) 23:21 <+egbert> bryce: cool, thank you for the report! 23:21 < agd5f> robclark, thanks! 23:21 <+egbert> robclark: thanks to you as well 23:21 < robclark> updated the date on bylaws too to take from git.. I *assume* that isn't the sort of thing that needs voting on but if anyone disagrees I'll update branch) 23:21 <+egbert> next item: khronos - anything to discuss there? 23:22 < robclark> I think khronos is danvet? So probably no? 23:22 <+egbert> right 23:22 <+egbert> last thing on my list was xdc. 23:22 <+egbert> have we heard anything about a date proposal, yet? 23:23 < robclark> iirc, last I heard was "soon" but marcheu might be able to update? 23:24 < bryce> are there any concerns over USA travel restrictions? 23:24 <+egbert> it would be good to have a definitive date by mid of march. 23:24 <+egbert> bryce: well, i wanted to bring this up last meeting but then decided against it. 23:25 < robclark> bryce, well perhaps some concerns over USA still being here in the fall .. not sure how much we can do about that.. 23:25 <+egbert> as it looks atm things might not be all that bad 23:26 <+egbert> if we wanted to move elsewhere - we'd find a new organizer and place very quickly. 23:27 <+egbert> as people would like to know where to go and when soon. 23:27 < whot> i heard mexico is just on the other side of the wall :) 23:27 < whot> but yeah, we can't predict things like this, so right now just going for a confirmed date seems prudent enough 23:27 * robclark kinda hoping the checks and balances (aka judicial branch) thing works out.. although starting to reconsider taking pgp keys with me when I leave the country.. 23:29 < bryce> if things do need to be changed, guess we should just ensure it's communicated early enough to not disrupt too many travel arrangements 23:30 < whot> i think if we end up not being able to host the conf in the US then disrupting travel arrangements may be the least of anyone's worries... 23:30 <+egbert> bryce: right. but to change anything we'd need to find a new organizer. 23:30 < robclark> even in the unlikely chance the EO is reinstanted (or some new variant of it holds up), I don't think it effects too many XDC attendees? (and probably in that case there are bigger problems) 23:30 <+egbert> we may have to start doing virtual conferences .... 23:31 < robclark> yeah 23:31 < robclark> yeah 23:31 <+egbert> robclark: this is true - on the other hand if it affects anyone it would be bad still 23:32 <+egbert> but, yeah, without an alternative in sight, let's just hope for the best. 23:32 < robclark> yeah 23:32 <+egbert> is anyone pinging marcheau regarding a date? 23:33 * robclark did on this channel 10min ago, if that counts :-P 23:34 <+egbert> right, let's do it again, this time without me mistying ;) 23:35 <+egbert> marcheu: do you have any information on possible dates for xdc? 23:35 <+egbert> i guess this is all on xdc. 23:35 <+egbert> have i missed any subject? 23:36 <+egbert> topic i mean.. 23:36 < bryce> egbert, fast meeting :-) 23:37 <+egbert> bryce: yeah! i'm tired ;) 23:37 <+egbert> it is almost midnight here 23:37 <+egbert> ok, looks like there's nothing else. 23:37 <+egbert> i guess, we can close the meeting, then. 23:38 < robclark> nothing more here 23:38 <+egbert> i will write up minutes and publish the irc logs - not tonight though. 23:38 < robclark> k, gn 23:38 <+egbert> tomorrow morning 23:38 <+egbert> good day/night everybudy! 23:40 < bryce> thanks! 23:41 * whot waves 23:47 < marcheu> egbert: not yet, I'll ping our admin about it